![]() Add a couple accessories and it is a great run-and-gun camera. Right now the Pocket 6K Pro is his favorite camera because it does so much without being too expensive or too big. Working handheld also is easier with the Pocket Camera’s design. Shooting outdoors often and traveling a lot the lighter setup is an advantage. To provide some context, he uses the Pocket 6K Pro for documentary and travel videos as well as video licensing. The Pocket 6K Pro on the other hand needs to do some serious cropping to get the fastest frame rates. It is a “proper” camera with all the usual controls and connections that more professional workflows and productions need.Īnother thing about the sensor is that it does a smart sampling which means in all the resolutions there is no cropping required. It can even hit 60 fps in 12K and 120 fps in 8K-insane options for such a camera. When used properly the image can be one of the best you can get out of a modern video camera. The new sensor delivers a spectacular image with unmatched detail thanks to the 12K resolution. That’s pretty much where we are going to leave it. The Pocket 6K hits a more modest 6144 x 3456. Getting into resolutions, the URSA will do up to 12K (obviously), which is 12,288 x 6,480 for DCI. This larger size makes room for a lot more function buttons and controls. ![]() ![]() The URSA Mini Pro 12K is about twice the weight and size of the Pocket 6K Pro. Starting with the obvious, the cameras have very different form factors. They have a variety of high frame rate options, internal NDs, and have very similar menus. Both have Super 35mm sensors and an EF mount (the URSA does also come with a PL mount). While there will be something of a spec comparison, if image quality is your sole decider you will be happy with either one.īeing made by Blackmagic these cameras have a lot of similarities. If you are looking at one of these two cameras, or want to see how they might work together, you should check out this video by Of Two Lands.īefore we get into it, it is worth pointing out that both cameras deliver outstanding image quality. It’s at least an interesting comparison even if it seems a bit absurd on the surface. There is also the whole 6K vs 12K discussion that needs to be had as well. Of course, core imaging tech does have some of the same options – namely Blackmagic RAW – but the differences in body design are quite substantial. Besides being made by Blackmagic, the URSA Mini Pro 12K and Pocket 6K Pro don’t seem to have many similarities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |